Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessShort report

The value of minilaparotomy for total hysterectomy for benign uterine disease: A comparative study with conventional Pfannenstiel and laparoscopic approaches

Pedro Royo email, Juan Luis Alcázar email, Manuel García-Manero email, Begoña Olartecoechea email and Guillermo López-García email

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain

author email corresponding author email

International Archives of Medicine 2009, 2:11doi:10.1186/1755-7682-2-11

Published: 22 April 2009

Abstract

Background

The aim of this paper is to review and compare the results obtained using the Pfannenstiel, laparoscopy and minilaparotomy approaches for total hysterectomy procedure in relation to benign uterine diseases.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis was performed on 165 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases at our centre during the period 2004 to 2006.

Findings

The minilaparotomy procedure was the fastest procedure with a mean time of 73.4 minutes (range: 67.85 to 78.94 minutes, p < 0.001). Hospital stay was shortest for laparosopic procedure (mean time: 3.24 days, range: 2.86 to 3.61 days) (p < 0.001). The rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications were not statistical different among three procedures.

Conclusion

The minilaparotomy procedure offers a minimally invasive option for total hysterectomy due to benign uterine disease.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.